Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes: > Ok, a possibility would be to change the value accepted by > `LaTeX-insert-label' to, e.g, > > (t . ("section" . section) ("subsection" . environment)) > > so each element of the CDR is a cons, whose CAR is the name of the > macro/environment, and the CDR is the type.
Quite complex. Maybe it would be simpler to have special keys for the alist, e.g., ((environment-whitelist "figure" "table") (environment-blacklist ...) (section-whitelist ...) (section-blacklist ...)) And basically, having both a *-whitelist and a *-blacklist doesn't really make much sense. So it could be compressed to, e.g., ((environments t "figure" "table") (sections nil "paragraph" "paragraph*" "subparagraph" "subparagraph*")) meaning that only figure and table environments get a label (t = whitelist), and only sections "larger" than paragraph get one (nil = blacklist). > The `LaTeX-label' function must be changed to take a second mandatory > argument specifying the type of the macro/environment to be labeled. I think `LaTeX-label' can figure that out on its own by calling `LaTeX-current-environment'. If that returns "document", we're probably inserting a section label, else we're inserting an environment label. > I'd prefer to avoid this, as it makes `LaTeX-insert-label' more > complicated, but it's the only solution I envisage to support both > macros and environments. What do you think? I think the above suggestion is not too complex and should solve the issue at hand. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
