>> I'm not against this change, I'd only like to know if we can avoid to
>> move all files around. For ELPA, I understand the problem is that
>> preview.el isn't in the `load-path', we could add "preview/" (actually
>> (expand-file-name "preview" TeX-lisp-directory) ) to the `load-path'
>> in tex-site.el (is it ok?), but then we'd have to adapt our install
>> tree accordingly.
> I'm not exactly sure if having a preview/ subdir is only a load-path
> issue.
ELPA packages are generally expected to put their .el files at the
top-level. This affects various things, such as the load-path, the
autoloads, and more. You can hack you way around most of those problems
one way or another, but it's just simpler to move preview to the
top-level and forget about the whole issue.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
