Thanks, I'll try to give that a spin
On another note, I was hit by this
\begin{enumerate}[a)]
I have a macro that cleans up envs and sets \begin/end parts on lines of their
own, attempting to leave any arguments alone.
I my macro (with point at [) I'm attempting to jump to the matching ], but
using (forward-sexp) this fails on
[a)]
leaving me at ) and I end up with
\begin{enumerate}[a)
]
Any advise on the proper method to go to a matching end?
/Lars Madsen
Institut for Matematik / Department of Mathematics
Aarhus Universitet / Aarhus University
Mere info: http://au.dk/daleif@imf / More information:
http://au.dk/en/daleif@imf
________________________________________
From: [email protected]
[[email protected]] on behalf of Tassilo Horn
[[email protected]]
Sent: 27 November 2014 16:08
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-devel] extended reftex-search-document
Lars Madsen <[email protected]> writes:
Hi Lars,
> I was wondering, has anyone thought of making an extended version of
> reftex-search-document?
>
> By this I mean a similar feature, but where one can add, say a
> callback, that will make extra tests on a match found, and if the test
> fails, automatically continue to the next match.
>
> This could be rather useful then editing sources other people
> wrote. For example, adding that we are only interested in matches
> outside of math.
>
> In the manuscript I'm currently editing, there are a lot of standard
> commas missing in the text, so if I had a feature like this I could
> make a regexp (only lower case matches) of standard words that should
> always be preceeded by a comma in my language, as a callback it should
> be looking to see if a comma was already present.
>
> I haven't gone too far down the details of how tags-search (which
> reftex-search-document use) actually work.
That shouldn't be too hard. Have a look at `tags-search'. That sets
`tags-loop-scan' to `(re-search-forward ',regexp nil t) to do the actual
search. So just make your own `lars/tags-search' function by copying
`tags-search' and setting `tags-loop-scan' to something like
`(when (re-search-forward ',regexp nil t)
(check-whatever-needs-to-be-checked))
Bye,
Tassilo
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
