Uwe Brauer <[email protected]> writes:
> I just found out that latex-pretty-symbols.el provides, at first
> glance, basically the same features as x-symbol-mode.
Just for the record: I've just added `prettify-symbols-mode' support for
(La)TeX to Emacs' built-in tex-mode.el. If you run a very, very recent
emacs, you could activate that in AUCTeX using
(setq-local prettify-symbols-alist tex--prettify-symbols-alist)
(add-function :override (local 'prettify-symbols-compose-predicate)
#'tex--prettify-symbols-compose-p)
in a function in LaTeX-mode-hook. I'll add that do AUCTeX, too (if
p-s-m is available).
> However there is one small difference:
>
> - both package display sub and superscripts actually one a
> lower/higher position compared with the orginal line as in
> $\int_a^b$, however x-symbol-mode does *not* display _ or ^,
> while GNU emacs does. Can I customize this behaviour?
The above also displayes the _ and 1 as-is. I didn't really test, but I
think `prettify-symbols-mode' can't really do this. It can just take
symbols (in the syntax-table sense) and compose them to some unicode
character. That doesn't suffice for what you are looking for.
Bye,
Tassilo
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
