Documents compiled with texexec, should use texexec and/or mkiv accordingly. Functions by/for texexec, are unaffected.
I have seen many more adopted changes in 'mark iv' than with 'texexec'. For example, As recent as a month ago, a table's requirements (as specified by a power user) would not compile with either 2013 or 2014 'mark iv''s operations. This was later confirmed, by installing a 2015 version, which successfully completed it. The convention officially settled with your "Mark IV" remark. So from a user's point-of-view, do you think the other definitions should stay the same, or should follow the "Mark II" conventions? _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
