Hi Tassilo,

Tassilo Horn <[email protected]> writes:

> Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> I have not signed the FSF papers for Emacs,
>
> Why not?  Didn't we tell you that a CA on Emacs covers AUCTeX, too, but
> the inverse is not true?  Because of that, I usually encourage new
> contributors to file a CA on Emacs instead of AUCTeX.

Dunno what happened back then.  Probably I missed your hint.

>> I'm also not familiar with Emacs contributions, if I can prepare a
>> better patch, please give me hint.
>
> A Git patch against Emacs' master branch where the ChangeLog entry is
> part of the commit message would be even more convenient at my side.
> But for now, the patch is good enough.

Thanks for the hint and installing the patch; I'll try to get it right
next time.

Best, Arash


_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel

Reply via email to