> Uwe Brauer <[email protected]> writes:
> Uh, why? That's Emacs' built-in TeX mode. Why would you ever require
> that in parallel with loading AUCTeX?
> First try not to use Emacs' built-in TeX mode at the same time as using
> AUCTeX, or any further analysis is likely a waste of time.
Ok but it is my understanding that tex-mode is needed since
,----
| tex--prettify-symbols-alist is a variable defined in ‘tex-mode.el’.
| Its value is shown below.
|
| Documentation:
| A ‘prettify-symbols-alist’ usable for (La)TeX modes.
|
| Value: (("\\setZ" . 8484)
| ("\\setR" . 8477)
| ("\\setP" . 8473)
| ("\\setN" . 8469)
| ("\\alpha" . 945)
| ("\\beta" . 946)
| ("\\gamma" . 947)
| ("\\delta" . 948)
| ("\\epsilon" . 1013)
| ("\\zeta" . 950)
| ("\\eta" . 951)
| ("\\theta" . 952)
| ("\\iota" . 953)
| ("\\kappa" . 954)
| [back]
`----
And I recall that some difficulties I encountered were solved by Tassilo
however submitting patches to emacs not to auctex. In any case I do what
you suggest.
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
