Marcin Borkowski <[email protected]> writes: Hi Marcin,
> Amsrefs is a (sort of) replacement for Bib(La)TeX. Unlike those > tools, it is written completely in TeX. The disadvantage of amsrefs > is that it can't sort entries - you have to take care of that > manually. The advantage is that you program the bibliographic style > completely in TeX, e.g. in yur preamble (and in an easy way, though > not as powerful as BibLaTeX), so you can have everything (article, bib > style and bib entries) in a single file. (Defining custom field and > entry types is also very easy, all within LaTeX.) Uh, that sounds quite complicated to integrate into RefTeX. Basically, you have to have something similar to `reftex-parse-bibtex-entry' or `reftex-parse-bibitem' for amsrefs entries which knows about custom entry types and fields. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
