2016-04-13 20:20 GMT+02:00 Matthew Leach <[email protected]>: > Hm, interesting. I should probably have a working XEmacs installation > if I'm working on AUCTeX....
I have XEmacs installed on my computer but I don't use it. I just compile AUCTeX from time to time to make sure there aren't huge errors (like functions not defined there. BTW, to be sure I'm not going to introduce a function not defined in XEmacs I often grep the name of that function in AUCTeX source: if it's already used odds are good it's available, otherwise I fire up XEmacs and see if it's defined) but of course in this way I can't catch runtime errors. At some point we should discuss whether to continue supporting XEmacs: I don't know AUCTeX users apart from Uwe running XEmacs and I know he's also moving to GNU Emacs. In addition, since we started using debbugs, he's been the only one to report bugs while running XEmacs: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/search.cgi?phrase=xemacs&search=search&skip=0&attribute_field=package&attribute_operator=STREQ&attribute_value=auctex&order_field=date&order_operator=NUMA&max_results=100 Bug tracker isn't a good sample of our community, but sometimes I think we're still supporting XEmacs for just one person. Sorry, Uwe :-) Bye, Mosè _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
