Hi Ikumi, to be honest I was surprised to discover there are programs like TeXShop and TeXworks, that are other *TeX editors. I thought that the builtin PDF viewer would have been used, but actually TeXworks segfaults on my system if I try to open a PDF file with it (probably it tries to open the PDF as it were a *TeX file). I don't have OS X, I don't know what happens with TeXShop. Even if the builtin viewer of another TeX editor were launched, I don't see how this can be useful to AUCTeX users.
Bye, Mosè 2016-04-15 9:50 GMT+02:00 Ikumi Keita <[email protected]>: > Hi Arash, thanks for your comment. Sorry for being late to reply, since > I don't subscribe to auctex-devel. I found your message on the web > archive http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/auctex-devel/ . > >> Is there a particular reason why the remainder in tex-jp.el >> shouldn't move into tex.el as well? > > The primary reason is being conservative. I know little about these > viewers, and cannot judge whether they are harmless for environments > without Japanese support. So I left them in tex-jp.el, which is loaded > only when Japanese tex is required. (At least the line relevant to xdvi > is such an example because the construct `%(xdvi)' is defined in > tex-jp.el.) > > So don't mind to move the viewers into tex.el if you know that they > does not raise problems in non-Japanese tex environments. > > Best regards, > Ikumi Keita > > _______________________________________________ > auctex-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel > _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
