Hi Mosè, Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes:
> 2016-09-12 14:06 GMT+02:00 Arash Esbati <[email protected]>: >> >> I've also patched graphics.el in order to ask for package options when >> loaded. The macros in graphicx.el are guraded to do the right thing >> when loaded through graphics.el (it should be the way around, but moving >> everything into graphics.el is not an option). WDYT? > > I agree that it should be the other way around (graphicx.sty requires > graphics.sty), but why you say this is not an option? Maybe not now > if there is no one willing to undertake this task, but in the future? The actual doing was not my main concern; I was more thinking about "it is not an option for me to empty a venerable style almost completely before asking the original author". And since it is not really necessary, ... >> If ok for you, > > Only a question: why do you remove eps from the list of extensions > allowed with pdflatex? It's true that it isn't natively supported, > but epstopdf is allowed to run in restricted shell escape since TeX > Live 2011 and I often use EPS images when I compile with pdflatex. Arrggh, thanks, I forgot that completely. I left the EPS realms long time ago; I put my figures in one PDF file and use the `page' key. I will update the news section and submit a patch. Thanks, Arash _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
