Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> writes:

Hi Uwe,

> This is a real git patch, not one from hg, the commit message is somehow
> improved. Still don't understand why this step is necessary.

Am I right that I can ignore this patch since your other two mails with
questions regarding your other patch and my suggestions are older than
this mail?

> From e3df45c5e28d4e859abc8d6ad5a81811d56d7d3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es>
> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 16:03:51 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Correct=20incorrect=20filling=20caused=20by=20s?=
>  =?UTF-8?q?entence-end-double-space=20to=20nil.=20Change=20=C2=AB=5F=C2=BB?=
>  =?UTF-8?q?=20and=20=C2=AB^=C2=BB=20to=20=20@code{^}=20and=20@code{=5F},?=
>  =?UTF-8?q?=20Change=20=09@font-latex-fontify-script{}=20-->=20@code{font-?=
>  =?UTF-8?q?latex-fontify-script}.?=

Looks like that's not intended. ;-)

Oh, and "Correct incorrect filling" is not a good commit message for a
patch against auctex.  That's part of the history in your repository
while creating the final patch.  We want just the very final, perfectly
shaped end result.  No one needs to know that you messed up double-space
sentence ends before finally succeeding. ;-)

> -Lastly, @AUCTeX{} with Emacs 25 or later can display certain math macros
> -using Unicode characters.  That's called prettification.
> +Another tool to obtain more WYSIWYG feeling is to set
> +@code{font-latex-fontify-script} to ‘invisible’ so that the @code{^} and
> +@code{_} in sub and superscripts are not displayed.

Ok, I see, this is old stuff...


auctex-devel mailing list

Reply via email to