> Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> writes:
> I guess there's a better way than to clone the repository again. See
> for example:
Yes I know that. It is just rebasing makes me feel uneasy.
> Indeed, I just verified that using your older pretty2.patch. Maybe it
> only applies the first patch in the mail. But on the other hand, that
> patch contained a hunk that changed the same section the other patch in
> the mail created. So in theory that should have failed then. So it
> seems it applies all patches as one single commit and takes just the
> message from the top-most patch.
Something is odd there, when exporting various changesets the git-hg
plugin does strange things. As I said hg import works as expected but
not git am --patch-format=hg.
Worse the commit message is odd. So I will try the rebase command and if
that fails to use git :'(
> I think that problem doesn't arise when using git because git
> format-patch creates one mail per commit, never a mail with many
> auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel mailing list