> Uwe Brauer <[email protected]> writes: > I guess there's a better way than to clone the repository again. See > for example:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1725607/can-i-squash-commits-in-mercurial Yes I know that. It is just rebasing makes me feel uneasy. > Indeed, I just verified that using your older pretty2.patch. Maybe it > only applies the first patch in the mail. But on the other hand, that > patch contained a hunk that changed the same section the other patch in > the mail created. So in theory that should have failed then. So it > seems it applies all patches as one single commit and takes just the > message from the top-most patch. Something is odd there, when exporting various changesets the git-hg plugin does strange things. As I said hg import works as expected but not git am --patch-format=hg. Worse the commit message is odd. So I will try the rebase command and if that fails to use git :'( > I think that problem doesn't arise when using git because git > format-patch creates one mail per commit, never a mail with many > commits. > Bye, > Tassilo > _______________________________________________ > auctex-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
