Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> writes:
> I think `TeX-pop-to-buffer' should be implemented as
> (pop-to-buffer buffer other-window (and norecord (not TeX-record-buffer)))
> according to its name and doc string.
> Is it enough to just change as proposed above? Or should we provide some
> compatibility treatment for users who have customized this option?
nice catch. I suggest we make the change you propose and add a note to
the news that users customized this variable should revisit this.
auctex-devel mailing list