Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> writes:

> I think `TeX-pop-to-buffer' should be implemented as
>   (pop-to-buffer buffer other-window (and norecord (not TeX-record-buffer)))
> according to its name and doc string.
>
> Is it enough to just change as proposed above?  Or should we provide some
> compatibility treatment for users who have customized this option?

Hi Keita,

nice catch.  I suggest we make the change you propose and add a note to
the news that users customized this variable should revisit this.

WDYT?

Best, Arash

_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
auctex-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel

Reply via email to