Hi Keita, Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> writes:
> Here is a quote from the doc string explaining KEY-VAL-ALIST argument > of `TeX-read-key-val'. `multi-prompt-key-value' has the same phrase as > well: > ,---- > | The car of each element should be a string representing a key and > | the optional cdr should be a list with strings to be used as > | values for the key. > `---- > The description about the cdr isn't correct. In the actual > implementation, KEY-VAL-ALIST argument of `TeX-read-key-val' > is given in a form like > (("placement" ("tbp" "t" "b" "p")) > ("name") > ("fileext") > ("within" ("chapter" "section" "subsection")) > ("relatedcapstyle" ("yes" "no"))))) > (taken from floatrow.el) > [...] > I think the doc string should be adapted accordingly. What do you think > about it? Good catch :-) I think this should read: TABLE is an alist. The first element of each list is a string representing a key and the optional second element is a list with strings to be used as values for the key. Does is make sense? Any comments welcome. Best, Arash