Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes: >> I see, sorry for nitpicking but wouldn't be CHANGES.org or something >> like this, less confusing? > > Yes, we can consider that if CHANGELOG.org is confusing; CHANGES.org > works for me as well.
IMO, it's confusing when CHANGES.org is manually written and summarized in changes.texi which in turn is used to generate CHANGES. :-) Isn't there another term? Maybe VERSION_NOTES.org or something will do... Bye, Tassilo
