Hi Arash, >>>>> Arash Esbati <ar...@gnu.org> writes: > This doesn't feel right. AUCTeX has some options to control the output, > and I think we should support them. I mean, the only issue is currently > with dvipdfmx as discussed above, and I don't think we should throw the > baby out with the bathwater because of this one glitch. And I think we > should also get close to what auctex-latexmk offers, and we're not far > away. WDYT?
I think most Latexmk users have their own .latexmkrc because the stock Latexmk just runs latex enough times and generate .dvi file. (no pdflatex and no .pdf output) So I guess they are accustomed to have full control over the options with their .latexmkrc. However, I don't object to your idea, so please proceed. Regards, Ikumi Keita #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine #Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW
