>>> "AE" == Arash Esbati <ar...@gnu.org> writes: > Hi Tassilo, > Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org> writes:
> Many thanks for working on this (and to Stefan as well). >> So basically, we should decide now if we switch to going ELPA-only in >> which case we'd not use master anymore but develop directly in main. >> (I'd be in favour of it, obviously.) >> >> We could also keep master as our development branch and still use the >> new "main" branch (which I would probably rename to "elpa" in that case) >> for elpa and turn on auto-sync. It would be a bit less automatic: we'd >> need to keep merging from master to the "main" / "elpa" regularly and >> increment the Version manually for releases. But it's still better than >> the status quo (less committed generated files; better Version >> determination). > I was thinking about this too and my vote is to go with option 2 (i.e., > not your favorite ;-). Given the problem I just encountered and reported I would like to support that vote: compiling and testing from the current master seems much more flexible and general. (but I have very little say on these matters, of course, but it would be sad if I can't test emacs without a lot of hassle) -- I strongly condemn Hamas heinous despicable pogroms/atrocities on Israel I strongly condemn Putin's war of aggression against Ukraine. I support to deliver weapons to Ukraine's military. I support the EU and NATO membership of Ukraine.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
