Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes: > Hi all, > > NEWS.28 contains: > > ** New 'declare' forms to control completion of commands in 'M-x'. > '(declare (completion PREDICATE))' can be used as a general predicate > to say whether the command should be considered a completion candidate > when completing with 'M-x TAB'. > > '(declare (modes MODE...))' can be used as a short-hand way of saying > that the command should be considered a completion candidate when > completing on commands from buffers in major modes derived from > MODE..., or, if it's a minor mode, when that minor mode is enabled in > the current buffer. > > Note that these forms will only have their effect for 'M-x' if the > 'read-extended-command-predicate' user option is customized to call > 'command-completion-default-include-p' or a similar function. The > default value of 'read-extended-command-predicate' is nil, which means > no commands that match what you have typed are excluded from being > completion candidates. The forms will, however, be used by 'M-S-x' by > default. > > latex.el provides 26 commands. We can add this one form to them: > > (declare (modes LaTeX-mode)) > > and they will be available in LaTeX-mode and docTeX-mode (and other > derived modes), given that the user has set > `read-extended-command-predicate' accordingly. > > What do people think? Is this worth the effort? > > Best, Arash
It seems a good idea...
