David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Franz Haeuslschmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...] >> This thread covers a problem with AUCTeX running under >> _XEmacs_. I have learnt that one no longer needs to explicitly >> load AUCTeX within XEmacs. The message I referred to even >> contains an excerpt from the info documentation of AUCTeX, which >> states that "AUCTeX and preview-latex should now be active by >> default". If I had written about (X)Emacs, my explanation would >> have been imprecise -- I guess -- but for XEmacs, it is still >> valid, isn't it? > > Yes and no. AUCTeX never provided a package setup for XEmacs > previously, so it would be misleading to say that anything has > changed. How and whether you need to specifically activate AUCTeX in > XEmacs has always been at the discretion of the XEmacs packagers. Indeed, I was not aware of that, thank your for enlightening me. > We will provide much more of a framework with AUCTeX 11.80, but > whether this gets picked up by the people actually wrapping up an > XEmacs package, will remain to be seen. Now I'm curious: is the version after AUCTeX 11.55 already 11.80? Appendix B of the info docs provides an idea what will come, however not when it will come. Is there a document that presents a planning of AUCTeX releases or are these issues buried in the downs of the AUCTeX mailing lists? Franz. _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
