>>>>> Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oh, just noticed that I was writing nonsense. Of course your > suggestion would work. I simply mixed this up with thoughts about > moving the reference keywords in `font-latex-built-in-keyword-classes' > further downward which would allow other keyword classes to overwrite > the reference face.
> Anyway, another issue I have with the proposal is that I don't think > footnotes alone warrant a new built-in keyword class. If we do this > for other LaTeX macros as well we'll soon have a keyword class > inflation. That means the suggestion about disabling selected classes > of the built-in keyword classes would still be my favorite. Yes, I can see the danger of keyword class inflation, but if one uses footnotes extensively for citing historical sources and the like, as I do, then a footnote class is at least as important as, for example, a math-command class, actually more so as I don't use very much maths in my work. I appreciate that everyone has different ideas of what is important, but I would have thought that many who need long textual footnotes and who choose to use font-locking would prefer not to see long footnotes with all the text rendered in the same colour. Sorry for banging on about this excessively: I won't repeat the case again. Your suggestion would, of course, be a welcome solution if I haven't been convincing enough. Regards, -- Jim Ottaway _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
