Franz Haeuslschmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup writes: > >> I have just thrown out the references to TEXIPWD completely. I >> have my doubts that this makes a difference though. Could you >> check again? > > Works for me. And yes, it doesn't make any difference.
Uh, what? Ah, ok, you were not the one reporting the problem in the first place. > Don't get me wrong. The remark on `texi2dvi' versions was meant as > a hint to Uwe, the original poster. In my opinion, it is in the > responsibility of the developer to provide a sane environment for > the build of AUCTeX. However, it may be a task of the documentation > to describe such a development environment. It is quite clearly stated that a recent version of makeinfo is required _if_ you are going to build from CVS _or_ are touching source files. If texi2dvi gets called in the process of a normal build straight from the tarball, this is a bug, I'd say. In the untouched tarball, for normal targets makeinfo should not be required. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
