> > meantime, is there something I could do with > > ghostscript that could help with the contrast or the > > blurriness? Thanks,
> and remove the -dTextAlphaBits=4, or replace it with > -dTextAlphaBits=2. Removing it will have a drastic effect, replacing > it by the lower value much less so. thanks. reducing the anti-aliasing improved the contrast, but made the rasters uglier. So I ended up keeping the original option. By the way, one of the options in the default value of preview-gs-options is `-DNOPLATFONTS'. The option mentioned in the documentation of my (AFPL) ghostscript (8.51) is `-dNOPLATFONTS'. Is the other option equivalent to this one? > Another thing to note is that installing and using outline fonts tends > to get sharper bitmaps as a result. But the default dvips commands used by preview-latex have the option `-Pwww', which are supposed to embed Type 1 fonts anyway. (Just to make sure, I created a test.ps file using the `-Pwww' option and opened the .ps file in emacs. All of the FontType declarations in there were Type 1 (except for the first one, which was Type 3.) Doesn't this mean the png images are being generated from outline fonts? Rajneesh. _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
