* Christoph Bier (2005-11-14) writes:
> Ralf Angeli schrieb am 13.11.2005 19:38:
>
>> Yes, multi-line constructs will not be fontified correctly.
>
> That's what I expected. But I did not know what is meant by
> "multi-line constructs" because of automatic line wrapping (correct
> expression?).
I don't know what you mean with automatic line wrapping. Do you mean
the functionality provided by `auto-fill-mode', i.e. the insertion of
linebreaks once you write beyond the fill column and type SPC? Or do
you mean functionality like the one provided by longlines.el which
wraps long lines when a file is loaded and unwraps these lines again
when the file is saved?
> Now I found a multi-line construct (very long graphic
> name).
Do you mean a continuation line? See (info "(emacs)Continuation Lines").
That's not what I am talking about. What I mean are constructs which
span more than one line (and thereby one ore more linebreaks),
e.g. some words in quotation marks like in the following example:
text text text text text text text text text ``quote quote quote
quote quote'' text text text text text text text text text
> [Help by code]
Better use this slightly changed function:
(defun TeX-scramble-buffer ()
(interactive)
(goto-char (point-min))
(while (not (eobp))
(cond
((looking-at "\\w+")
(replace-match (make-string (length (match-string 0)) ?x))
(goto-char (match-end 0)))
((looking-at "\\\\")
(goto-char (TeX-find-macro-end))))
(forward-char)))
>> but it has the disadvantage that
>> I have to insert the mailing list address by hand when replying.
>
> So shouldn't I do this?
Yes. The last message I got twice.
--
Ralf
_______________________________________________
auctex mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
