Jan-Ake Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: >> And honestly: what do you expect short of magic? If your color scheme >> is different on paper and in the editor, there is not too much one can >> hope for. We get the basic text case without color changes catered >> for. > > I'd like to add that I think that white-on-black mathematics look > terrible. Especially as a preview, white-on-black onscreen and > black-on-white onwhatever give very different visual impressions.
I find that even pink on green or similar works quite better than white-on-black. So maybe this is a problem with the suitability of rendering/antialiasing/gamma correction mechanisms and could be improved to a point where it is tolerable. > Determining the "good" format of this-and-that expression is useless > in white-on-black since the looks are completely different when > inverted. preview-latex is one of the (good!) reasons I changed to > black-on-white in emacs years ago. Well, I guess at the time you changed, white-on-black really was not supported by preview-latex at all. But the problem remains that preview-latex, after all, is a WYSIWYG tool, and large departures from the paper look are not easy to reconcile on the screen. I think we do a reasonable job. A more thorough possibility would be to do this with color transfer functions, but frankly, how do you then convert a color pie chart from black-on-white to pink-on-green? Where does red go? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
