>>>>> DK == David Kastrup [2006-6-8] DK> It was not reported upstream and it would have saved me a bit of DK> work just recently.
That's a pity, sorry. It should not happen in the future, as I and Frank (which does a much better work than me in this respect) try to always forward Debian auctex bug reports upstream whenever appropriate. Are you subscribed to the PTS[1]? You can get a mail copy of every future Debian bug report for the auctex source package (that is auctex and preview-latex-style binary packages) if you like. (You could subscribe the bug mailing list if you wanted to, though I won't recommend it, as many reports are not upstream related.) DK> The analysis is correct and the current fix in preview-latex DK> consequently has the side effect described in connection with the DK> `delayed' option. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I'll DK> fix this for the next release. Glad to hear this, I'll drop a note to the original submitter. DK> Anyway, I've seen that AUCTeX 11.83 has already been committed into DK> unstable. Awesome! Thanks, I had been testing CVS snapshots last week, so I was pretty ready to ship the Debian package at release time. Footnotes: [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/auctex.html, look for "Subscription - Package Tracking System". -- Ciao, Davide _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
