* Ralf Angeli (2006-07-03) writes:

> * David Kastrup (2006-07-03) writes:
>
>> We might leave the current behavior as an option, but for keeping it
>> as a default, I want to hear more than theoretic rationalizations
>> (without them, the feature wouldn't even be there).  I want to hear
>> someone actually speaking up for (or against) it who is affected.
>
> Let's deactivate it.  I doubt we will get much feedback on this list.

How about the following patch?

--- tex.el	07 Jul 2006 21:06:48 +0200	5.581
+++ tex.el	07 Jul 2006 22:30:20 +0200	
@@ -4446,6 +4446,11 @@
   (concat "^" (regexp-quote TeX-dollar-string) "\\|[^" TeX-esc "]"
 	  (regexp-quote TeX-dollar-string)))
 
+(defcustom TeX-math-insert-double-dollar nil
+  "If non-nil close double dollar math by typing a single `$'."
+  :group 'TeX-macro
+  :type 'boolean)
+
 (defcustom TeX-math-toggle-off-input-method t
   "*If non-nil, auto toggle off CJK input methods when entering math mode."
   :group 'TeX-macro
@@ -4478,14 +4483,18 @@
 	     (string-equal (substring (car texmathp-why) 0 1) "\$"))
 	;; Math mode was turned on with $ or $$ - so finish it accordingly.
 	(progn
-	  (insert (car texmathp-why))
-	  (save-excursion
-	    (goto-char (cdr texmathp-why))
-	    (if (pos-visible-in-window-p)
-		(sit-for 1)
-	      (message "Matches %s"
-		       (buffer-substring (point)
-					 (progn (end-of-line) (point)))))))
+	  (if TeX-math-insert-double-dollar
+	      (insert (car texmathp-why))
+	    (insert "$"))
+	  (when (or (string= (car texmathp-why) "$")
+		    (zerop (mod (save-excursion (skip-chars-backward "$")) 2)))
+	    (save-excursion
+	      (goto-char (cdr texmathp-why))
+	      (if (pos-visible-in-window-p)
+		  (sit-for 1)
+		(message "Matches %s"
+			 (buffer-substring
+			  (point) (progn (end-of-line) (point))))))))
       ;; Math mode was not entered with dollar - we cannot finish it with one.
       (message "Math mode started with `%s' cannot be closed with dollar"
 	       (car texmathp-why))
-- 
Ralf
_______________________________________________
auctex mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

Reply via email to