* David Kastrup (2006-09-10) writes: > Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> And I always thought that `M-x re-search-forward RET' would be as >> interactive as `C-M-s' ... > > Sigh. I don't mean "interactive" as in "(interactive)" here, but > "interactive" as in the "i" of "isearch". So please replace > "non-interactive commands" in the line above by "non-interactive > searches". > > I would have thought it obvious that this is what I meant, but you are > right that I used a slightly wrong expression.
Uh, the "i" in "isearch" stands for "incremental". Anyway, it's obvious now that the isearch commands invoked via `C-M-s RET' or `C-s RET C-w' are not equivalent to the similarly looking `re-search-forward' and `word-search-forward' commands. -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
