On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 04:48:09PM +0200, Guilhem Bourrié wrote: > The fact that biblatex.sty exists in your system does not imply that > your program will find it.
Yes. That is why I assumed the problem had rto do with biblatex's environment. > Try to update the list of pathnames that are explored by pdflatex > and other engines, > > usually it is a file ls --r, updated by texhash or mktexlsr. I don't know what paths are explored by pdflatex or what "other" engines refer to. Perhaps you only meant that runing # texhash should take care of paths. But it does not seem to: # texhash texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R... texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN... texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVE... texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R... texhash: Done. Again, $ echo $TEXINPUTS /usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf: but when I run latex command on a .tex file containing citations I get: ERROR: LaTeX Error: File `biblatex.sty' not found. > As for the pathnames, it depends on the OS, bu the tds and tools > should be similar. Are you saying that it makes no difference that my path is /usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf even though the biblatex.sty file is actually located in /usr/local/texlive/2011/texmf-dist/tex/latex/biblatex/? Excuse my ignorance, but if the path is .../2011/texmf/ how can it find a file in .../2011/texmf-dist/tex/latex/biblatex/? It seems to me biblatex.sty is not in biblatex's environment, but surely I must be wrong. Haines _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
