Tassilo Horn <[email protected]> writes:
> If I remove that restriction and consider newlines both at column 79
> and 80, it seems to catch all of them (but of course it might then
> catch too much)...
Ok, now I've pushed a change d4059b8 which implements the above. Now
wraps at columns 79 and 80 are removed under certain conditions, and the
period-condition now allows removal only if the char following the
newline is a word char.
so
...bla/bla/bla.
tex)
would be unwrapped whereas
this is just a sentence.
And here goes the next one. Bla bla...
is not.
Bye,
Tassilo
_______________________________________________
auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
