Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes: >>> I'm fine with a new release, I'd just like to fix some bugs before the >>> release, like https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19504 (I >>> looked at it some days ago but I didn't find new solution apart from >>> those I suggested there -- if we can't find a solution soon we can go >>> ahead with the new release anyway). >> >> What's wrong with the third version of `TeX-completing-read-multiple'? >> I mean, of course it's not overly charming to have three different >> versions of a function > > Ok, my question is: can we pick up the old Emacs' definition of > `completing-read-multiple' even if it has internal (crm--*) functions?
Yes, at least as long as those are defined and right now they are. >>> BTW, before a new release I'd like to know if AUCTeX should cater >>> for the mess OS X El Capitan created with MacTeX. Feedback is >>> welcome in this regard. >> >> I didn't know about such issues. And a quick google search pointed >> me to https://tug.org/mactex/UpdatingForElCapitan.pdf where it is >> only said that /usr/texbin/ is gone and now users need to put >> /Library/TeX/texbin/ in their PATH. So what? > > Yes, I meant this problem, but can users sort this problem out by > themselves or should AUCTeX help them? In general, I think having a working TeX distribution installed and properly configured is a requirement we can take for granted. But we could test (executable-find "tex") top-level and message a big fat warning if that returns nil, and we might also test `system-type' to give a Mac-specific warning. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
