Tassilo Horn <[email protected]> writes: > Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes: > > Hi Mosè & Andrea, > >>> I think it's easy enough to check TeX-engine in the hook function so >>> that one hook is enough. But then a more generic name would be >>> better. >> >> Good point! >> >>> How about TeX-after-compilation-finished-hook? >> >> Clear enough. > > Ok, I've renamed it now in the code and the docs, and the old name is > now an obsolete variable alias. Additionally, the ConTeXt sentinel now > runs the hook, too. Thanks Andrea for reporting that it didn't. (Next > time, please report such problems *before* we do a major release. ;-)) > > Bye, > Tassilo
Thanks to all of you to solve the problem so fast. I think that I need to switch from the ELPA version to the git version of AUCTeX so I will be able to report problems as fast as possible. Did you think about publish a development version of AUCTeX in MELPA? Ciao, Andrea. > > > _______________________________________________ > auctex mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex -- Andrea De Michele _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
