Hi Marcin,
2015-11-30 14:48 GMT+01:00 Marcin Borkowski <[email protected]>:
> I have to finally analyse your patch to the bug we talked about (sorry
> for my terrible delay!),
Don't worry, take your time ;-)
> but let me chime in again here, since I've
> studied large parts of texmathp recently.
Good :-)
> The only place `texmathp-search-n-paragraphs' is used is this (and
> apparently it's also buggy!!!):
>
> (re-search-backward "[\n\t][ \t]*[\n\r]" nil 1 texmathp-search-n-paragraphs)
>
> I'm pretty sure it should say \r instead of \t (the first occurrence).
Yes, makes much sense, just installed the change. Thank you!
> (And it still does not solve the dtx problem, I guess.)
As I supposed, this doesn't take into account comments, so for example
% Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do
% eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
%
% Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris
% nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
%
% Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum
% dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
is seen as a single paragraph. Probably something like
"[\n\t][ \t]*%*[ \t]*[\n\r]"
would be better, but this hard-codes "%" as comment sign, and I don't
know if fixes the concrete problem encountered by Jean-François.
Bye,
Mosè
_______________________________________________
auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
