Hi Mosè, On Fri, Mar 04 2016, Mosè Giordano wrote:
> 2016-03-03 8:49 GMT+01:00 Tamas Papp <[email protected]>: >> Yes, Crimson does look nicer. I changed the kerning a bit, to a >> compromise between the default and my somewhat cramped original >> version. AFAIK tighter kerning is common for logos. > > Indeed this is better. I'd like to propose some further changes: > > - change the background color to the color of the header text (8596B0) > - change the E color to something lighter, for better readability > - add to the background the code used to produce the logo itself, to > make it "recursive" (but cheating with \lstinputlisting). This looks fantastic now. Nicely designed and, with the code itself, nerdy beyond reason (which I like, I am a nerd). > Please find attached the code and the resulting PDF. I didn't alter > kerning and lowering of E. Note that xelatex is not needed to compile > the document, but it helps reducing the size of the final png file. > > You can see a sketch of the possible result of the logo in the > homepage at http://www.dmf.unisalento.it/~giordano/auctex-index.html > The logo doesn't fit in the current header (height is 91px, the logo > would be barely visible with that size), I think the sidebar is a > better place for it, but suggestions are welcome. I think this is fine. Despite the fact that we didn't need a logo in the first place (IMO), we ended up with a very good one :D Best, Tamas _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
