Hi Mosè, Kind of what I expected --- syntax highlighting is too much clutter. I would go for the plain version.
Best, Tamas On Sat, Mar 05 2016, Mosè Giordano wrote: > Hi all, > > thanks for the comments! I prepared two versions of the logo, both > with syntax highlighting of the code in the background, one with > colored highlighting (same color scheme as default Emacs settings), > the other one with keywords in bold face and comments in italic. The > code has been stretched, as suggested by Jean-Francois, but with the > whole code visible. > > You can find both logos at > http://www.dmf.unisalento.it/~giordano/auctex-index.html > > I agree that colored syntax highlighting may be distracting here, on > the other hand keywords in bold face can't be really distinguished > from non normal text, so the only highlighted lines are the local > variables at the end. To sum up, probably syntax highlighting is not > needed at all. > > Bye, > Mosè > > 2016-03-05 11:04 GMT+01:00 jfbu <[email protected]>: >> Le 05/03/2016 10:35, Tamas Papp a écrit : >>> >>> Hi Mosè, >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 04 2016, Mosè Giordano wrote: >>> >>>> 2016-03-03 8:49 GMT+01:00 Tamas Papp <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> Yes, Crimson does look nicer. I changed the kerning a bit, to a >>>>> compromise between the default and my somewhat cramped original >>>>> version. AFAIK tighter kerning is common for logos. >>>> >>>> >>>> Indeed this is better. I'd like to propose some further changes: >>>> >>>> - change the background color to the color of the header text (8596B0) >>>> - change the E color to something lighter, for better readability >>>> - add to the background the code used to produce the logo itself, to >>>> make it "recursive" (but cheating with \lstinputlisting). >>> >>> >>> This looks fantastic now. Nicely designed and, with the code itself, >>> nerdy beyond reason (which I like, I am a nerd). >>> >>>> Please find attached the code and the resulting PDF. I didn't alter >>>> kerning and lowering of E. Note that xelatex is not needed to compile >>>> the document, but it helps reducing the size of the final png file. >>>> >>>> You can see a sketch of the possible result of the logo in the >>>> homepage at http://www.dmf.unisalento.it/~giordano/auctex-index.html >>>> The logo doesn't fit in the current header (height is 91px, the logo >>>> would be barely visible with that size), I think the sidebar is a >>>> better place for it, but suggestions are welcome. >>> >>> >>> I think this is fine. >> >> >> I find too that this is very good. >> >> I tried replacing a few lines with >> >> \node[inner sep=0pt] at (-0.18,0.07) >> {\color[HTML]{CED9ED}\resizebox{9mm}{!}% >> {\lstinputlisting[basicstyle=\ttfamily]% >> {\jobname}}}; >> >> in order to better see the code, in particular the characteristics local >> variables at bottom. >> >> Attached is PDF. >> >> >> Jean-Francois >> >>> >>> Despite the fact that we didn't need a logo in the first place (IMO), we >>> ended up with a very good one :D >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Tamas >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> auctex mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> auctex mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex >> > _______________________________________________ > auctex mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
