Tassilo Horn <[email protected]> writes:
> Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> besides this, are you aware of any AUCTeX style which should be updated
>> for TL2017 release?
>
> Not that I know of but I don't follow the TeXLive development closely.
Hi Tassilo,
yes, same here.
>> Currently, I see only fontspec.el which should be touched.
>
> Feel free to do that. I have no clue if and what changed ther. ;-)
Will do. Most notably, I like the new syntax in macros like \fontspec
et al. where the optional argument comes after the mandatory font name.
>> And a fontification bug in comment.el where only the first line in
>> comment environment is fontified in `font-lock-comment-face'.
>
> I've just fixed that. :-)
Thanks. While you're on top of font-latex.el game again, can you also
have a look at my proposal here?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/auctex-devel/2017-04/msg00011.html
On my wish list is also correct fontification for optional and/or
mandatory arguments of math environments, e.g.:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage[overload]{empheq}
\begin{document}
\begin{align}
a_1 &= b_1 + c_1
\end{align}
\begin{empheq}{align}
a_1 &= b_1 + c_1
\end{empheq}
\begin{empheq}[left=\empheqlbrace]{align}
\label{eq:2}
a_1 &= b_1 + c_1
\end{empheq}
\end{document}
I think the functions `font-latex-match-math-envII' and
`font-latex-extend-region-backwards-math-envII' should be changed for
this. Right?
Best, Arash
_______________________________________________
auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
