Hi Davide, 2017-07-22 2:55 GMT+02:00 Davide G. M. Salvetti <sa...@debian.org>: >>>>>> MG == Mosè Giordano [2017-7-21] > > [...] > > MG> We have the Debian maintainer reading us :-) Davide, do you think > MG> you'd be able in the future to prepare the Debian package from a git > MG> tag or an ELPA package? > > Hi everybody, > > in the long run I could use both, but ATM the most straightforward way > for me would be to package from a git tag, especially if I could use > git archive to get a orig.tar.gz. > > Apart from packaging, I think that AUCTeX users would benefit from > having clearly marked stable releases. What about using some branching > git workflow like using the master branch to track stable releases and a > next branch to develop new features until they are deemed stable enough > to be included in master?
I'm not sure this workflow would work for a program with few people using the git version. I guess this is the case for AUCTeX, but I don't numbers to back up this assumption. Ok, we'll return on this topic later. Bye, Mosè _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
