Hi Mosè, Yes, I'm using \include. I understand that \input does not create extra .aux files, so there it's not an issue, but then I cannot use \includeonly. So I guess it's a trade off between two convenience features.
Thanks for the clarification! Greg On Sat 10 Feb 2018 at 19:24 Mosè Giordano wrote: > Hi Greg, > > 2018-02-10 19:16 GMT+01:00 Greg Bognar <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > > > Say you are working on a multifile document with file1.tex, file2.tex, etc, > > and > > with the master file masterfile.tex. It's handy to clean up the generated > > files > > with TeX-clean. However, TeX-clean will only delete files which have the > > base > > name of the master file, i.e., masterfile.*. But TeX also generates .aux > > files > > for file1.tex, file2.tex, etc., and these are not deleted. Is there a way > > to > > have TeX-clean delete these files as well? Or is there any reason this > > would > > not be a good idea? > > > > (I tried putting "*\\.aux" in TeX-clean-default-intermediate-suffixes list > > of > > extensions, but it didn't work.) > > > > This is mostly a matter of convenience, but I'm curious if it's possible. > > I guess you're "\include"ing the files, rather than "\input"ting them, > right? I agree it would be a good idea to clean up the auxiliary > files for secondary files, but the way AUCTeX currently records the > names of the included files this isn't supereasy. They're listed in > `TeX-active-styles', but mixed together with classes and packages, so > it's difficult to extract just the names of the included files. > > Unless you have a real need to use "\include", with "\input" you don't > have multiple auxiliary files. > > Bye, > Mosè _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
