Rodolfo Medina <[email protected]> writes: > David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: > >> With regard to functions: instead of using keyboard macros, you can >> first call some complex command like query-replace-regexp, then use >> >> C-x ESC ESC (translated from C-x <escape> <escape>) runs the command >> repeat-complex-command (found in global-map), which is an interactive >> compiled Lisp function in ‘simple.el’. >> >> It is bound to <again>, <redo>, C-x M-:, C-x M-ESC. >> >> (repeat-complex-command ARG) >> >> Edit and re-evaluate last complex command, or ARGth from last. >> A complex command is one which used the minibuffer. >> The command is placed in the minibuffer as a Lisp form for editing. >> The result is executed, repeating the command as changed. >> If the command has been changed or is not the most recent previous >> command it is added to the front of the command history. >> You can use the minibuffer history commands M-n and M-p >> to get different commands to edit and resubmit. >> >> [back] >> >> in order to get "a Lisp form for editing" which you can copy and paste >> into a function definition. > > > Is it possible to have the same thing for any command previously given, not > only the complex ones...? Also `M-a', `C-f'...?
Doesn't C-h k M-a give sufficient information for those? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
