On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 10:29 PM Tassilo Horn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Tassilo Horn <[email protected]> writes: > > > Or are you asking if that will make that work for all standard AUCTeX > > completion functions. I guess so, although just setting > > > > (setq-local completion-extra-properties > > '(:annotation-function > > (lambda (x) (message "AF: %S" x) "foo"))) > > > > or let-binding it around the `completing-read' call in > > `TeX-insert-macro' had no effect. The function has never been called. > > I think the reason is that we use just a list as completion table > whereas the feature requires a function-valued completion table. That > should be doable with `completion-table-dynamic'. Feel free to play > with it.
Could someone here give a minimal working example for the question discussed here with `completion-table-dynamic'? HZ
