Please forget everything regarding my "ingenious" idea regarding cygwin: cygwin
has it's own texlive-environment, so all comparisons make zero sense. Apologies
for adding to the confusion!
Am 25-Aug-2022 19:26:22 +0200 schrieb petepetit...@my.mail.de:
> I just got another idea. Before switching wsl, I had emacs/ aucteX
succesfully running 'out-of-the box' under cygwin. > Were this not comparable
conditions, .i.e. a subsystem in which emacs/ aucteX had to fetch the
pdflatex.exe in Tex Live > in Windows. So, maybe it could be helpful to
reinstall that again and compare entries in corresponding .init- or .emacs >
files? I gave it a try. Just added another question mark, though:
Strangely, emacs/aucteX in cygwin seems to be executing just 'latex' and 'tex'
without .exe to succesfully access Tex Live in Windows. That is what is written
in the aucteX-menu, at least. What I also noticed: Contrary to wsl, in cygwin
there no teX-related lines at all in .emacs.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FreeMail powered by mail.de - MEHR SICHERHEIT, SERIOSITT UND KOMFORT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FreeMail powered by mail.de - MEHR SICHERHEIT, SERIOSITT UND KOMFORT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FreeMail powered by mail.de - MEHR SICHERHEIT, SERIOSITT UND KOMFORT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FreeMail powered by mail.de - MEHR SICHERHEIT, SERIOSITÄT UND KOMFORT
