Re: question about NVDA remote, why is it insecure?
The people who are saying it's insecure are probably the same people that, like the majority who don't read terms of service, would not read a disclaimer attached to any remote access service. Unless you know the friend in person, or know an internet friend extremely well, or the guy's a professional, remote access of any kind is always a risk. Teamviewer isn't automatically more secure just because it is a paid service. In fact, it being one, it's not transparent, so you can't see the sourcecode for yourself to decide if it's more secure, you just gotta put your trust in the company which, today has become an extremely! suspicious statement right there. With nvda remote's sourcecode available users could see for themselves that yes, the autoconnect feature does store your code locally. Is this a problem? Yes, a big problem, but it's not like it can't be solved. If you use the autoconnect feature, never, ever do autoconnect on a pu blic server. Just, don't do it. That's automatically putting yourself at risk. If you don't use autoconnect, then you're fine, because the one-use key isn't stored locally. People who use remote access stuff should have a good general knowledge of the security risks involved when using any remote access software, and know how to prevent such risks. Nvda Remote is not insecure. It has a security aflw, t thabut aw flcan be very easily prevented.
_______________________________________________ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
