Re: Reviewing AudioWizards, ranting, and who knows what else
Again. I understand everyone's frustrations. Echoes was not worth the $22.99 price tag. However, it could have been improved a lot. And eventually, they could have done something good, but since nobody had anything good to say, the devs decided they were done with game development. Could they have improved? Of course. However, people should have chosen their words more carefully when reviewing Echoes. I'm not saying the criticisms are wrong, but the approaches that people take aren't. And going back to Post 2 and the magazine, when was this magazine released? Did people then not realize that although computers were more advanced than they had been in the past, there was only so much they could do. Gulch was one of the first types of game made in this way, and it was good for its time.
Edit: The criticisms are right, but the approaches people take and the wording people use does not help the situation. Sorry about the typo
-- Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector