Here's the one that compared analog and digital operation - this is the
DEQX's predecessor - the 8024 - it was double the price then, and had
nowhere near the digital advances of today, yet he rates it as "value
for money" of 200% ! It's one of the better reviews because he really
concentrates on room problems, which is what it's all about.

http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/equipment/0101/behringer8024.htm

I've had the ESL 57's for 15 years, although in that period I also had
the 989's briefly. Waaaaay too much bass on the 989's, had to sell them
- I'll never live in a room big enough - plus they didn't have the
midrange immediacy of the 57's, nor the low volume full fidelity. The
ESL 57's took me out of the speaker chase 15 years ago aside from
trying the 989's, never would I replace them. Plus with even the old
solid state Quad 303 they're great - safely run too - but low power
tube amps, which I also have, are great - but not so much better that I
want 10 roomheating tubes any more.

But you are right about the room required for Quads - mine are 8' from
the rear wall, and they absolutely have to be at least 4' and even then
the bass can be boomy. 8' is awesome. The WAF on mine is good though -
because they sit between rooms - between the living room and the dining
room, so they're not really visible when in the LR, and certainly aren't
in the way. What a break! BUT, the left quad is only 1' from the wall to
the left of it, and there's a wall and sofa between them which collected
a lot of bass. Plus, although I sit 13' away, there's a wall right
behind my listening couch, and corners to either side albeit 23' apart
- corners are corners. Even with this setup, there was unacceptable
bass boom clouding the whole thing - it was awful.

"Room problems are serious and I think under considered" - you're soooo
right they're underconsidered - here's a perfect example. I moved from a
26x40 room to my current 23x13 room - plugged the same stereo in, and it
was a COMPLETELY different stereo - no roomboom in the 26x40, massive
roomboom in 23x13. I couldn't believe the difference - and it was the
worst on CD. I took a chance on the Behringer and wow - what a
difference. For my tuner it wasn't so necessary because radio stations
EQ a lot already - but CD was awful in my new room. Even with good MP3
streams with the SB, I prefer to use the Behringer. PLUS, living in a
condo, it's very good for neighborly relations.

As for the real traps, I agree about the WAF - they and others don't
even pass the MAF (Male Acceptance Factor) for me, much less the WAF. I
used to have ASC tube traps, 12 roomlens, 2 shakti's, and other crap all
in one room. I couldn't stand it - that's no environment for listening
to music, I want to be in a nice room, with a glass of wine or a cup of
tea - not some hobby room littered with stuff like that. If I was smart,
I'd have bought the Tact back then, even though it was about $4500 US -
I'd have never had to go through the room treatment nightmare, and it
would have worked better anyway. If I'd known I'd end up spending that
much in room treatment in the long run, I'd have taken out a loan and
got the Tact.

"There is no way such a treatment will exist anywhere near
my living space" - agreed, that's where I am now. Put it this way -
next time you're considering a fancy $300 interconnect or some such
audio tweak for hundreds of dollars - ask youself - why not give the
Behringer a shake? It will give you an education on your room that's
worth the price alone, the fact that it sounds so good is just a bonus.
You can also buy a microphone so it will auto-EQ your room, but I won't
dare EQ above bass - that's too sensitive an area to the ear. Another
eye opener for me was the Creek OBH-12 passive preamp - that's what the
Behringer feeds and it's an awesome combo (the Behringers output is VERY
VERY high as per pro audio gear, so the Creek probably made things far
better just because of that).


-- 
quadguy
_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to