Mark_H Wrote: > > > So, assuming that the only limiting factors are jitter and RFI, and > assuming those can be tweaked to outperform a given CD transport then > there is no reason why the SB2 shouldn't outperform any given > transport? > > Mark
Mark- when you have some spare time take a look at: http://www.scientificonversion.com/AES13pre.pdf it will give you an idea of the factors which can effect the quality of a digital signal path. Aberdeen Components has applied this research in their TacT, Boz, SB2 and Stello mods. I have it in my buffered transport, RCS and 2150. Maybe an 'audiophile' dac implementation within the SB2 is the best way to go for most users, but for those of us using a digital processor between the source and amplifers, we still a digital signal. IMO, Slim Devices should offer a digital out only SB with AES/EBU and maybe upsampling like the new LyngdorfAudio CD-1 transport. - Dan -- mauidan _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
