I think this depends on your dac, what it does to reduce jitter and if
it is fussy about the frequency of the digital signal.

SB1 used an integrated chip to do the dsp functions and produce the
spdif output.  This had a known limitation that the exact frequency it
produced could be slightly off 44.1 KHz and given that the chip vendor
was unwilling to fix it, slim had no control over it.  This is no cause
for concern for the vast majority of dac users, but did impact some as
their external dac was unable to lock onto the signal.  There were also
some reports of channels swapping over in SB1 due to the operation of
the dsp chip.

The dsp chip in SB1 also used a PLL to derive the clock used for the
digital out.  This means that the jitter on this clock is higher than
that which would be obtained with a direct crystal based oscillator.

SB2/3 should have all of this solved - the spdif output is generated
directly from a crystal oscillator with no PLL.  There are two separate
crystals for 44.1 and 48 KHz sampling.

So what does this mean, I would suggest:

1) If you dac is not fussy about the exact frequency of the digital
input (does not experience 'lock' problems) and has internal circitry
to reduce jitter, then you may not hear any benefit from SB2/3.

2) If however your dac is fussy about locking or does not have strong
jitter rejection, then the SB2/3 is likely give better performance. 
The one hardware change between SB3 and SB2 will also be beneficial as
it should further reduce the jitter on the digital output.

In short SB3 (and 2) is definately technically better for the digital
output than SB1.  Whether you can hear this depends on how well your
external dac hides the influence of jitter from the transport.


-- 
Triode
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Triode's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=18116

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to