pfarrell Wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 13:11 -0700, void wrote: > > aberdeencomponents Wrote: > > > The best transformer known, the SC947-02 > > According to them. Not everyone agrees that they are the best. > > Have to agree with void on this one. Transformers are > either very efficient at one frequency, or very inefficient. > Since audio reproduction by its nature needs frequency response > of at least 20hz to 20Khz (and some would save from 10hz to 100Khz) > selecting transformers is an art. > > The recording studio engineers get into long and heated > discussions of which transformer sounds "best" on a particular > (track) recording. > > Using a transformer on a high frequency square-wave, as most > digital audio things are, seems strange to me. The before and after > shots of a square-wave through a transformer is standard in > oscilloscope 101. Or at least was when I was an undergraduate > years ago. > > > -- > Pat Farrell > http://www.pfarrell.com
Pat, and Viod, Find me a better one! Jon, the owner of the company wrote the book for the AES! The gear i use these t formers, operate from 44.1 to 192 khz. very few t-formers can properly operate above 44.1. You never know till you tried it.. thats what seperates us.... I try, you read. Regards! Anthony Aberdeencomponents.com In a world of compromise, WE DONT! -- aberdeencomponents ------------------------------------------------------------------------ aberdeencomponents's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=15574 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
