cvj,

Wayne at the Bolder cable company told me to try this one which might be the same unit (Wayne didn't forget to tell me that his supply is better) .

http://www.hosfelt.com
Mfg. # - 7202C-3
5-13/16" x 2-1/2" x 2-7/8"
Input: 117 VAC, 60 Hz
Output: 5 VDC @ 1.5 amp

I tried it and I did hear improvement. It gave more depth, clarity and smoothness. But if you have a space to for it, I would suggest you to get an linear PS and put it in a enclosure of your choice. David (Heuer) has done nice postings about his external linear PS recently. You should look that up.

I have tried my own yesterday and the effect is bigger than the adopter type.

On Dec 24, 2005, at 1:38 PM, cvj wrote:


I have just ordered a SqueezeBox 3 - and look forward to receiving it in
a couple of weeks.

In the meantime I have a question. Scott Faller's review of the SB3:

http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/equipment/1205/ slimdevices_squeezebox.htm

includes the following tweak:

----------------------------- snip-----------------------------
Tweaks

Before I go in depth about how the SB3 sounds, there are a couple of
things that you will want to know first regarding the stock unit.
First, the stock switching power supply is woefully inadequate for the
critical listening that we audiophiles do. Fortunately, a cheap easy
substitution of a $7, 5 Volt 1.5 Amp (regulated) wall wart brings a
significant gain in resolution

----------- end snip --------------------------------------

Any comments from users on this inexpensive "tweak"?

cvj


--
cvj
---------------------------------------------------------------------- --
cvj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2979
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=19412

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to