Skunk Wrote: > I wasn't either till i searched, so thanks for asking. > > Also gotta mention I still think it's easier to use SB for now, as > implementations of USB audio seem questionable at best in this stage of > the game. Unless you can build the thing yourself and really know what > you're doing, I'd stick with the SB for reasons eloquently pointed out > by Listner a few times. Or, I wouldn't trust 'a product' yet. > > Doesn't mean the future won't change, and it might be foolish to > dismiss the technology completely, but let the others dork with it > until their sound beats the SB's, at which point the convenience of > wireless and existence of homes wired for ethernet will be the only > (albeit still great) raison de etre. That's all.
I agree. And, anyway, if anyone is planning to build a properly designed D/A that pulls its data from a computer one might as well start with an SB and modify it. I did find that Burr-Brown article intriguing however, as it seemed to very elegantly solve the whole jitter issue for "clock recovery" type of transmissions! Sounds ideal for external DACs. (Now I will have to find out what my TacT does for clock recovery! ;-D ) -- P Floding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=20675 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
