philodox Wrote: > I actually sent the Brochure and Manual for the Digital Lens to Dan > Lavry for his opinion... and lets just say he doesn't have a high > opinion of what they are trying to sell. I'll take a look at that > link, thanks. :)
It depends on how you look at the Digital Lens: As a 1990s device it was relevant in its time, but today the word length extension etc. is long subsumed by the functionality built into current SRC chips etc. and the quality of source clocks & clock recovery, in terms of both error & jitter, has improved greatly since its introduction. However, as a way (when it is suitably modified) of syncing any arbitrary source (that does not have a word-clock input) to a word clock (without modifying the source itself) the Digital Lens is a useful platform - thus during my progression from SLIMP3 though SB1 & SB2 to a SB3 I have not had to modify each of the four above to sync them to my dcs Purcell-Elgar-Verona stack, I have simply been able to plug each successive generation of SB into my modified Digital Lens ... -- reeve_mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------ reeve_mike's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=995 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24670 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
